Bereichsbild Transdisziplinäre Konzepte und Methoden: Ausschnitt Notizpapiere zwischen Buchrücken

Transdisciplinary Concepts and Methods

 

>>project

 

Becker, Egon/Thomas Jahn (ed.) (1999): Sustainability and the Social Sciences. London/New York: Zed Books

Declaration "Enhancing Social Scientific Understanding of Sustainability" anlässlich der internationalen Konferenz "Sustainability as a Concept of Social Sciences" im Rahmen des UNESCO-MOST-Programmes im November 1996 in Frankfurt am Main

Deklaration "Für ein verbessertes (sozial-)wissenschaftliches Verständnis von Nachhaltigkeit"

Declaração "Pelo Desenvolvimento da Compreensão CientÌfica e Social da Sustentabilidade"

Policy Paper Sustainability: A Cross-disciplinary Concept for Social Transformation

Report on the preliminary results of the MOST-project "Sustainability as a Concept of the Social Sciences"

Link to MOST

 

Project:

Sustainability as a Concept of the Social Sciences

Coordination:

Dr. Thomas Jahn

Project team:

Prof. Dr. Egon Becker,
Dr. Thomas Jahn,
Dr. Immanuel Stieß,
Dr. Peter Wehling
Dr. Diana Hummel

Financing:

UNESCO, Paris

Duration :

1995-1997

Sustainability as a Concept of the Social Sciences - Decleration

Enhancing Social Scientific Understanding of Sustainability

Declaration on the occasion of the conference "Sustainability as a Social Science Concept" within the UNESCO-MOST Programme, held in Frankfurt, November 1996

AGENDA 21, the final document of the Rio-Conference on Environment and Development emphasises the importance of new scientific efforts and approaches for achieving sustainable development. The following four "programme areas" are identified:

With respect to the understanding of sustainable development, AGENDA 21 proposes a need to "intensify research to integrate the physical, economic and social sciences to better understand the impacts of economic and social behaviour on the environment and of environmental degradation on local and global economies". While the natural sciences traditionally are involved in environmental research to a very high degree, the support for the social sciences as well as the systematic enlisting of social scientific contributions to interdisciplinary research in this field have not yet been matched to the expectations of the post-Rio-process. A new strategic effort is needed both on the part of scientists and policy-makers, all the more so as sustainable development does not merely deal with the conservation of nature or the management of ecosystems, but more broadly and fundamentally aims at new models of societal development and social transformation. Sustainability refers to the viability of socially shaped relationships between society and nature over long periods of time. Therefore, environmental sustainability is closely linked to supposedly "internal" problems of social struc-ture, such as social justice, gender equality and political participation of local actors.

With regard to such issues, there can be little doubt that substantial and problem-oriented contributions of the social sciences are indispensable for the understanding of sustainability. This means it is necessary to open both the natural and social sciences to local environmental knowledge and different cultural and gender experience in order to deepen the understanding of sustainability in its environmental, economic, social, political and cultural aspects and to avoid the supremacy of hegemonial, technocratic and ethno-centric approaches.

We feel the following points reflect burning needs as how science and related research policies should strengthen the role of the social sciences within the research into sustainability:

Of crucial importance is the establishment of new interdisciplinary research programmes on the national as well as international level. Within such new research programmes, the social sciences should not only play an instrumental role for national governments or natural scientific experts, but must express the multiplicity of cultural, regional or gender perspectives on sustainable development.

Closely linked to this issue, the building of scientific capacities for sustainability research has to get started, particularly in the so-called developing countries.

Social scientists themselves must get involved in a process of re-orientation towards new issues as well as towards inter- or transdisciplinary work not only among the social science disciplines but also in conjunction with natural sciences.

Given this situation in general and with the aim of strengthening chapter 35 of AGENDA 21 we claim:

1. The MOST-Programme ("Management of Social Transformations") of UNESCO which can be regarded as an appropriate institutional frame for sustainability-related and policy-relevant research in the social sciences must play a central role in international research activities on sustainable development. There-fore, we exhort both national governments, particularly those of the industrialised countries, and international institutions to give more and adequate financial and organisational support to the MOST-Programme in order to create a basis for interdisciplinary and problem-oriented social scientific research into sus-tainability.

2. Regarding the building of sustainability research capacities in the social sciences, there is a strong need for new forms of interdisciplinary research institutes and organisations able to adequately study the problems raised by the objective of sustainable development. Establishing new interdisciplinary "Centers for Sustainability Studies" on international, national and especially regional levels could be a suitable and successful way to meet this need. In addition, existing institutions for development studies ought to incorporate the different dimensions of sustainability in their research. This implies a re-orientation of training and research in the industrialised countries of the North as well as the building of independent training and research capacities in the countries of the South. Interdisciplinary post-graduate programmes with appropriate curricula should be established at the universities of the North and South. The UNITWIN UNESCO Chairs programme can be used as an appropriate framework in this respect. Here too, the industrialised countries should engage much more in supporting and enhancing this process.

3. As the concept of sustainability represents a fundamental challenge at the theoretical and methodological levels, re-orientation within the social sciences themselves is required, implying

4. The project "Sustainability as a Concept of the Social Sciences" within the MOST-Programme of UNESCO has given an important impulse for enhancing re-orientation of both the research policies and the social sciences towards the new issues of sustainability. Moreover, it is intended to be the starting-point for building an international discussion and research network of (social) scientists concerned with sustainability as well as sustainable development policies. Policy-makers interested in sustainability issues should also be part of this network. In order to promote social science research on sustainability, exemplary research projects, especially in a cross-cultural and comparative perspective, are to be sketched out. Within this framework a main concern should be the examination of policies followed by the industrialised countries in order to contribute to a global change towards sustainable development strategies.

Substantial steps towards sustainable development can only be made, if national governments, Development Aid Agencies in industrialised countries, the UN system, particularly UNESCO, UNDP, UNEP, the World Bank, GEF (Global Environmental Fund), the European Union as well as private foundations are willing to support social scientific research on a broad organisational and financial basis. As a first step, political and financial support must be given to cross-national, social scientific pilot projects on sustainability, including scientists from countries of the North and the South.

List of first signatories

Prof. Henri Acselrad
Institute for Urban and Regional Planning (IPPUR), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

 
Prof. Egon Becker
Institute for Social-Ecological Research, Frankfurt;
and Dept. of Educational Sciences, University of Frankfurt, Germany
 
Dr. Tatjana Bochkareva
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
 
Prof. Rosi Braidotti
Women's Studies Department, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands
 
Prof. Lothar Brock
Dept. of Social Sciences, University of Frankfurt, Germany
 
Prof. Nazli Choucri
Dept. of Political Science, MIT, Cambridge MA, USA
 
Prof. Margrit Eichler
Dept. of Sociology in Education, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education,
University of Toronto, Canada
 
Dr. Marina Fischer-Kowalski
Institute for Interdisciplinary Research and Continuing Education, Innsbruck, Klagenfurt, Wien, Vienna, Austria
 
Prof. John Gowdy
Dept. of Economics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY, USA
 
Dr. Ramachandra Guha,
Bangalore, India
 
Prof. Paulina Makinwa-Adebusoye
Nigerian Institute of Social and Economic Research (NISER), Ibadan, Nigeria
 
Prof. Joan Martinez Alier
Dept. of Economics and Economic History, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain
 
Prof. Hisayoshi Mitsuda
Dept. of Sociology, Bukkyo University, Kyoto, Japan
 
Prof. Robert Paehlke
Dept. of Political Studies and Environmental and Resource Studies Program
Trent University, Peterborough, Canada
 
Dr. Shalini Randeria
Institute of Sociology, Free University, Berlin, Germany
 
Prof. Carlos Reboratti
Director, Institute of Geography, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina
 
Prof. Michael Redclift
Wye College, University of London, Great Britain
 
Prof. Rusong Wang
Dept. of Systems Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences (RCEES), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China
 
Prof. Carol Werner
Dept. of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA

 

back to short description