Project Head:
Thomas Kluge
Project Team:
Thomas Kluge
Alexandra Lux
Engelbert Schramm
Stefan Liehr
Irmgard Schultz
Cooperation:
German
Institute for Urban Affairs;
Institute for
Regional Development and Structural Planning, Erkner;
BTU
Cottbus/Department for Technical Infrastructure in Cities;
Working Group for Regional
Structure and Environmental Research Oldenburg
Funding:
Federal
Ministry of Education and Research

funding
programme Social-Ecological
Research

Project's Website:
http://www.networks-group.de/en/
Duration:
11/02 – 12/05
Field of research
Research Area:
water and
social-ecological planning
about the Institute
|
The joint research project "netWORKS – Transformations in Network-Related
Infrastructure Sectors," in which ISOE co-operated with other scientific
organizations, focused on the issue of possible responses to the
far-reaching changes currently facing society’s supply systems. At the
core of social-ecological problems under investigation are shifts in
existing structures within the supply and disposal systems and the misfit
of present regulations on this transformation processes. The joint
research group’s goal was to develop and test, in particular at the
communal level and in concert with those immediately affected, positions,
instruments and strategies that can be used to intervene in
social-ecological transformation processes. The aims here were to steer
these transformation processes into a corridor of sustainable development,
to keep future options for intervention open and to avoid an aggravation
of social-ecological problem complexes. Accordingly, a central product
generated by this research project is an instrument for supporting
strategic decision making within a sustainable infrastructure management.
As part of the project communal decision makers, state governments and
private businesses were addressed and brought into the process. These
groups are, on the one hand, target groups as far as the results of the
project are concerned, while being at the same time, in light of their
experience and competencies, participants in the process of developing
strategies. In particular, the joint research project examined aspects
of the processes of change in the field of urban studies, economics,
social sciences, ecology, urban engineering, and regional planning.
In November 2002, the joint research project started with a first
kick-off workshop gathering also interested praxis partners and members of
the advisory board. In the first half of 2003, current trends in four
infrastructure sectors were jointly investigated - in water supply, energy
supply, telecommunication and public transport. Main focus has been the
privatisation resp. liberalisation of the sectors and its social,
environmental and economic effects. Contingent requirements for regulation
have been identified (e.g. to maintain resource protection, to allow a
sustainable investment management at a communal level or to improve gender
justice). Its results (in German:
http://www.networks-group.de) and a comprehensive overview (in
English:
http://www.networks-group.de/en/veroeffentlichungen/DF7836.pdf) are
the initial point for further work.
On the occasion of the 2004 International Summer Academy on
Technological Studies in Deutschlandsberg/Austria, Engelbert Schramm gave
a review on the "Privatisation of German urban water infrastructure in the
19th and 21st century". It is available in English as pdf-file
ESDlandsberg.pdf (303 kb).
In major project work, ISOE was mainly occupied with aspects of resource
regulation. The observance of social and ecological aspects in the issues
of water quantity and quality (improvement in water protection), ensured the most optimal management of resources. Clarifying these issues
is of particular importance when it is a question of granting water rights
or developing alternative forms of resource management (e.g. tradable
water rights). For this reason, in particular the (German)
state governments were adressed, since these are responsible for the management of water
resources. The goal here was to work out key points for a reform of the
allocation of water rights.
The analysis of physical aspects was based on case studies of resource
regulation in two German regions (Fuhrberger Feld near Hannover and
Hessisches Ried in South-Hesse). As a result, regulations on the quantity
of water resources should focus on critical corridors (values);
transgressing those corridors (e.g. a minimum groundwater level)
implicates interventions in the management. Similar regulation modes for
water quality are thinkable (but could not be found in current practice).
However, the requirements for such water management rules are all the more
difficult to meet as the complexity of resource situation rises.
Another work field within ISOE’s part of netWORKS was the resource
allocation under the conditions of EU-Water Framework Directive and the
following changes in the national water law. The analysis of the current
allocation of water rights shows that there is no focus on eco-efficiency
(as a combination of macro economical and ecological efficiency). Further
needs in research could be identified concerning balancing of rival water
uses on local level considering formal and informal modes of
participation. Additionally, the relevance of the concept “Tradable
Permits” for the German water sector is discussed referring international
approaches.
With respect to the national and international debate on benchmarking
in water utilities, it was examined how social-ecological enhancement of
benchmarking concepts could cope with the challenges occuring within the
current transformation processes in the utility sector. On this behalf,
ISOE organised in co-operation with ARSU the symposium on “Benchmarking
Concepts in the Water Sector” in April 2004.
Furthermore, in the integration modules the scientific joint partners
clarified their basic concepts in an interdisciplinary dialogue:
Coordinated by ISOE, the heuristic functions of concepts as "sustainable
infrastructure management", "regulation", "transformation" or "coppling"
were examined. “Social-ecological regulations” were identified as crucial
for the project. So, netWORKS developed a concept that considers the
importance of adaptable regulations in transformation processes and could
deal with natural as well as societal dimensions. A theoretical paper on
this issue has been published as netWORKS-Paper and can be downloaded (in
German:
http://www.networks-group.de/en/veroeffentlichungen/, see also for an
English abstract).
The integration modules also focused on integration of the contents. For
the inter- and transdisciplinary integration as well as for the strategic
support tool (see above), a specific method for integration of different
knowledge bases has been designed. This approach was tested for
its applicability and transferability. Another focal point of this module
was the integration of gender issues into the research of netWORKS. First,
the relevant research questions from a gendered point of view were
identified and assigned to the different modules of netWORKS. Additionally
and based on focus groups, hypotheses concerning gender differences in
opinions on recent trends in water supply services were identified. The
results will also be considered in the strategic support tool for
decision-making. Central point in this context is the relevance of gender
differences in participation processes. While it could be stated for our
cases that customer rights are of high relevance, the question occurs,
what should these rights contain and how and by whom they could be
reviewed.
In August 2006 netWORKS published the handbook "Transformation in
Network Related Infrastructure Sector. Strategies for Communal Decision
makers" as an instrument for supporting strategic decision making within
sustainable infrastructure management (press material in German): Kluge, Thomas/Libbe, Jens (Hg.) (2006): Transformation netzgebundener
Infrastruktur. Strategien für Kommunen am Beispiel Wasser. DIFU-Beiträge zur
Stadtforschung, Bd. 45. Berlin: DIFU |